Sunday, December 2, 2007

Thoughts for the day...

THE JAYWALKER: (p.37)

Our behavior is as absurd and incomprehensible with respect to the first drink (Narc) as that of an individual with a passion, say, for jay-walking. He gets a thrill out of skipping in front of fast-moving vehicles. He enjoys himself for a few years in spite of friendly warnings. Up to this point you would label him as a foolish chap having queer ideas of fun. Luck then deserts him and he is slightly injured several times in succession. You would expect him, if he were normal, to cut it out. Presently he is hit again and this time has a fractured skull. Within a week after leaving the hospital a fast-moving trolley car breaks his arm. He tells you he has decided to stop jay-walking for good, but in a few weeks he breaks both legs.

On through the years this conduct continues, accompanied by his continual promises to be careful or to keep off the streets altogether. Finally, he can no longer work, his wife gets a divorce and he is held up to ridicule. He tries every known means to get the jaywalking idea out of his head. He shuts himself up in an asylum, hoping to mend his ways. But the day he comes out he races in front of a fire engine, which breaks his back. Such a man would be crazy, wouldn't he?

You may think our illustration is too ridiculous. But is it? We, who have been through the wringer, have to admit if we substituted alcoholism (Narc) for jay-walking, the illustration would fit exactly. However intelligent we may have been in other respects, where alcohol (Narc) has been involved, we have been strangely insane. It's strong language but isn't it true?

________________________

And a few words that I need to remember...

Kind: Of a sympathetic or helpful nature; gentle; arising from or characterized by sympathy or forbearance; of a kind to give pleasure or relief.

Cruel: Disposed to inflict pain or suffering; devoid of humane feelings; causing or conducive to injury, grief or pain; unrelieved by leniency.

2 comments:

HistoryGeek said...

I bet you could substitute like that quite a bit, but it's an apt analogy.

Aravis said...

I've always loved that passage. On one level, I completely understand their point.

On the other hand, the imagery cracks me up every time. I don't know why, but it does. *G*